Profile of Judge Robert R. Beezer
Copyright and Trademark Notice |
Disclaimer | Revised: 3/5/01
Use the Profile Comment Form to submit
your own impressions for inclusion on this page.
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Appointed by: President Reagan, 1984
Born: July 21, 1928 in Seattle, Washington
Education: BA, University of Virginia 1951; LLB, University of
Virginia 1956
Law Practice: Schweppe, Krug, Tausend & Beezer (1956-)
Judicial Appointments: Ninth Circuit (1984-present)
Opinions Reported in Appellate Decisions Noted:
Additional Sources of Information:
Comments from Visitors to the Appellate Counsellor Home Page:
- Ronald Williams (11/7/97)
- For reasons only known to Judge Beezer, he, and Judges Brunetti and Noonan, entered
judgment, affirming the lower court decision of then district judge Tashima. The facts and
law in support however, was known by all of the judges mentioned, to be frivolous. Judge
Beezer appear to have knowingly falsified the record of state court decisions, to justify
dismissing federal causes of action. Furthermore, all of the judges named are well aware
that relying on a state court's interpretation of a municipal ordinance, is manifestly
unjust, if such reliance is used to dismiss federal causes of action. Such reliance
forecloses a party's right to bring for claims challenging the application of the suspect
ordinance.
Notwithstanding whether Judges Beezer, Brunetti and Noonan were prejudiced
against the complaining party, based upon (false) accusations that had been made against
the party, each was still obligated to scrutinize the complaining party's cause of action
under the federal statutes under which the actions were brought. Each were well aware that
a mere reliance upon contested issues of facts, should not have been dispositive regarding
the claims, which were made and brought under the Civil Rights Act.
The concerned case Williams vs. City of LA, CA-94-56250 - decided March 25, 1996.
- Ronald Williams (11/19/97)
- It is little wonder that Judge Beezer would participate in ruling that an employee's pay
being cut and his duties reduced, does not constitute a "constructive discharge. In
Williams vs. City of LA, CA-94-56250, the same Judge Beezer ruled that a City employee
"voluntarily retired" from his employment, by applying for a pension, after
being terminated from his employ- ment. As long as our judicial arm of government, is
staffed with judges with bias in favor of employers and businesses, and against employees,
programs that protect rights, such as affirmative action programs, are vital to a
democratic society.
-
- Debra "Vylene" Green (11/27/97)
- I wanted to take the liberty to personally Thank You for all time you put into my case;
"Vylene Enterprises, Inc." After 12 years you would think I'd be able to collect
the judgment. Vylene was appealed to the 9th Circuit (3)times, and it looks as though
there might be another appeal back to the 9th Circuit. 94-56470 Vylene v. Naugles et al is
still on remand to the District Court.
Privacy Policy
URL for this page
http://www.appellate-counsellor.com/profiles/beezer.htm
